data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a88ba/a88ba0a922a0a431703c3a1a30212ebae74de030" alt="Law and the Bible"
Enough meandering. The Alfords begin by refusing to level the messages of each of the Wisdom books. The thrust of each book is not identical. Proverbs assimilates the biblical teachings of law and the natural order of justice; the "torah" Psalms (1, 19, and 119) present a covenantal model of Davidic kings whose success depends on fidelity to torah; Job addresses the apparent paradox between the injustices experienced by the righteous and a just God; Ecclesiastes provides room to breath for those whose experience of the world is injustice compounded by corruption; and Song of Solomon "a relational model in which the law is fulfilled in love."
But the varying trajectories are not left alone as if there was no coherent view of law in the Wisdom texts. Summarizing their materials the Alfords conclude with three "take-away" points for the implications of these texts on contemporary civil law:
- Wisdom literature reinforces the importance of the civil law; and
- Wisdom literature in unwavering in its commitment to the idea of divinely inspried natural law applicable to all societies at all times; but
- Civil law does not hold out an immediate solution to the pervasive problem of injustice in the world. Good law is a necessary but not sufficient condition of justice. Law abiding rulers are equally necessary (and commonly absent). Thus, "there is a future promise that God will judge the unjust ruler."
No comments:
Post a Comment