For folks, especially constitutional law wonks, who want to get into the weeds on the recent Hobby Lobby decision by SCOTUS, go here to read a piece by former Regent law school colleague David Wagner. Warning: David's analysis presupposes familiarity with the history of the Court's free-exercise jurisprudence prior to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). But even if you don't have David's command of the Court's con law decisions, you can appreciate his pithy analysis of the majority-dissent-majority interchange.
01 July 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment